MX23RW : Monday, June 14 01:41:41| >> :600:11350372:11350372:

Premier League January spending lowest since 2012

Premier League January spending lowest since 2012
© Reuters
The figure of £70million during the winter transfer window is dramatically down on last year's total of £230m.

Premier League clubs spent just £70million during the January transfer window as the coronavirus pandemic affected budgets.

That is the lowest total in the winter window since 2012, and dramatically down on last season’s £230m outlay.

A subdued transfer window – which closed on Monday night – will now be followed by a period of uncertainty in the market, according to a financial expert from Deloitte.

Premier League: estimated January spending.
PA graphic

Spending has risen steadily year on year of late with the exception of January 2019’s dip to £180m, but the ongoing effects of the lack of matchday spectators and diminished broadcast revenues make it difficult to know whether the trend will resume.

Tim Bridge of Deloitte’s Sports Business Group told the PA news agency: “It’s probably the toughest time ever to predict what the transfer market will look like in 12 or 18 months.

“I think the way transfer departments within clubs work now, it’s often quite scientific or quite analytical and now more than ever it’s very challenging to make sure you’ve got the data correct. It’s also challenging to make any sorts of estimates as to what the future of the market might look like.

“Getting fans back into the stadium is essential to the business model of football clubs, and then how the commercial model reacts.”

Manchester United’s Amad Diallo, Aston Villa new boy Morgan Sanson and West Brom pair Mbaye Diagne and Robert Snodgrass were among the highest-profile permanent signings as teams mostly stood pat or relied on loans.

Liverpool borrowed much-needed defensive cover in the form of Schalke’s Ozan Kabak – along with a low-cost permanent deal for Preston’s Ben Davies – while Martin Odegaard (Arsenal) and Jean-Philippe Mateta (Crystal Palace) were other temporary arrivals.

Despite just £7million being spent on deadline day, down from £25million a year earlier, January’s business took Premier League spending for the season to £1.4billion.

PA graphic
PA graphic

That was due to a summer window in which Premier League clubs parted with fees totalling more than £1.3billion and, according to figures from the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), accounted for 98 per cent of the net spend in Europe’s ‘big five’ leagues.

CEBR’s January report, commissioned by Football Index, estimated similar overall figures to Deloitte at £68m, with a £44m net spend which was again the largest among the big five.

Bundesliga clubs spent £38m more than they recouped, with Serie A and LaLiga producing minimal net spends of £4m and £1m respectively and Ligue 1 a profit of £2m – the 20 French clubs combined for £26m of signings and £28m of sales, largely due to Sanson leaving Marseille.

Pablo Shah, CEBR’s senior economist, said: “The January transfer window experienced an even more subdued level of activity than the summer. It’s noteworthy that even Premier League clubs have applied the handbrake in January, having ploughed ahead with high volumes of spending in the summer.

“Financial implications continue to cloud the outlook for European clubs. This season has also been unique in that the summer transfer window closed later in the calendar year. This may have impacted spending, with there being less time for clubs’ circumstances to change.”

Bridge feels uncertainty will persist – but that there could be beneficiaries among the reduced spending.

“It’s okay to have a period of revenue that you missed out on, but if that went to the 2021-22 season and beyond, then you would expect to see a natural shift in the transfer market,” he said.

“It’s certainly going to be an interesting couple of windows and I think in relative terms, compared to what we’ve seen previously, some clubs will feel they’ve got bargains in the transfer market.

“Whereas previously they might have had to spend upwards of £50million, a player may be available for £30-40m based on the situation at the selling club at a specific point in time. It’s one to watch with interest.”

ID:433361: cacheID:433361:1false2false3false:QQ:: from db desktop :LenBod:restore:9680:
Restore Data
Share this article now:
Did you know...?

rhs 2.0
Euro 2020 fixtures
Monday, June 14, 2021
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Todays Game Header Right
CManchester CityMan City38275683325186
2Manchester UnitedMan Utd382111673442974
5Leicester CityLeicester382061268501866
6West Ham UnitedWest Ham381981162471565
7Tottenham HotspurSpurs381881268452362
9Leeds UnitedLeeds38185156254859
11Aston Villa38167155546955
12Newcastle UnitedNewcastle38129174662-1645
13Wolverhampton WanderersWolves38129173652-1645
14Crystal Palace38128184166-2544
16Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton38914154046-641
RWest Bromwich AlbionWest Brom38511223576-4126
RSheffield UnitedSheff Utd3872292063-4323

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Transfer Talk Daily
Match previews - twice weekly
Morning Briefing (7am UTC)
Ultra close-up image of Kevin De Bruyne [NOT FOR USE IN ARTICLES]Get the latest transfer news, match previews and news direct to your inbox!